Future Beyond Polymers

Polymers (Durable or Biocompatible) are an integral part of Drug Release Matrix in current generation DES as they ensure the Release Kinetics of the active drug. However, there are certain risks associated with permanent polymers. Delayed arterial healing (DAH) following DES implantation has been demonstrated in human autopsy studies and animal models.

Risks Associated With Permanent Polymers*

*Minerva Cardioangiologica 2009 October;57(5):567-84

Current DES Polymers are often associated with Flaking, Webbing and Peeling which leads to impaired action of active drug.

VIVO ISAR is an innovative technology which eliminates the use of Polymer by using Dual Drug Technology: Sirolimus and Probucol

Polymer Free Technology

Sirolimus

It is a well-studied and clinically proven Immunosuppressant.

It inhibits activation of T cells and B cells by reducing their sensitivity to interleukin-2 (IL-2) through mammalian target of rapamycin inhibition (mTOR).

Probucol: A Safer Alternative

*Data on file (IMTR Report 20210931)

MICROPOROUS SURFACE

Micropores are created by Sandblasting Technique – A unique method used to enhance continuous drug delivery where pores are created to ensure optimum drug release kinetics which prevents Neointimal Proliferation leading to Restenosis and Stent Thrombosis.

PROBUCOL

Mimics the function of polymer by slowing down the release of Sirolimus drug.

SHELLAC RESIN (WAX FREE)

Prevents flaking and webbing of drug co-mix

SIROLIMUS

An anti-inflammatory and anti-proliferative agent.

ABLUMINAL COATING

Facilitates uni directional drug release and less systemic exposure, ensuring improved healing and faster Endothelialization.

Drug Release Kinetics

*Biomaterials 2009 Feb; 30(4):632-7

Clinical Studies

10 Year Follow up Data in Diabetic Patients*

Study Background

Efficacy & Safety Outcomes

10 Years Follow-up with 3002 Patients, Polymer-Free DES Showed Similar Results With
Regards To Safety & Efficacy When Compared WithDES With Permanent Polymer in
ACS Subset

2022

At 10 years, the outcomes of patients treated with VIVO ISAR compared wiht durable polymer-based ZES were similar in the subgroup of Diabetic Patinets. Stuided in 3002 patients

2020

At 5 years, outcomes of patients treated with Vivo Isar compared with durable polymer-based ZES were similar in the subgroup of STEMI.

2016

At 5 years, Vivo Isar with no polymer demonstrates similar rates of definite probable stent thrombosis as PP-ZES

2023

New-generation DES have been shown to improve both safety and efficacy outcomes as compared to early generation DES, including for patients with Coronary Artery Calcification At 10 years Clinical outcomes in patients with moderate-severe coronary calcification according to polymer coating strategies PF DES (n =755) TLR 26.1%, MI 6.5%, Definite or probable stent thrombosis 1.8% are lower as compared to Biodegradable Polymer or Permanent Polymer

2021

In this long-term analysis at 10 years, polymer-free VIVO ISAR showed similar efficacy & safety profiles as durable polymer-based ZES. Studied in 3002 patients

2017

At 5 years in diabetic patient subset , outcomes of patients treated with Vivo Isar compared with PP-
ZES were similar

2016

Type and press enter to search